Legal Opinion
United States v. Gama-Bastidas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2000No. 98-4169PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Jesus Roberto Gama-Bastidas (“Gama-Bastidas”) appeals from a conviction and sentence that he contends was imposed in violation of the law. He argues that the underlying indictment to which he pleaded guilty failed properly to charge him with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and, therefore, that the district court erred in sentencing him on that offense following his plea of guilty. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because Gama-Bastidas did not assert his challenge to the sufficiency of the indictment until after his conviction, we…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Adebowale AdesidaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. ForbesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jose Demetrio Arteaga-Limones and Mike Lozano CantuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. George L. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Luiz Ben ZviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Ricco Devon PrentissCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. AveryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.