Legal Opinion
Weske v. Samsung Electronics, America, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 19, 2013No. Civ. No. 2:10-4811 (WJM)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs in this putative class action allege that a circuit board defect (the “Defect”) caused their Samsung refrigerators to stop cooling. Plaintiffs assert claims for the violation of various consumer protection laws, fraudulent concealment, and breach of implied warranty. Defendants Samsung Electronics, America, Inc. (“SEA”) and Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) (together “Samsung”) move under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss all claims. Samsung also moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Mark Donelson v. Ameriprise Financial Svcs, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Weske v. Samsung Electronics, America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- AMERICAN REGENT, INC. v. SOMERSET THERAPEUTICS, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- American General Life Insurance Company v. Wilmington Trust, National AssociationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- BERNARD v. COSBYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.