Legal Opinion
Weske v. Samsung Electronics, America, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 27, 2014No. Civ. No. 2:10-4811 (WJM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs in this putative class action purchased Samsung refrigerators that stopped cooling, allegedly because of a circuit board defect (the “Defect”). Plaintiffs allege that Samsung knew about the Defect but failed to disclose it. Defendants Samsung Electronics, America (“SEA”) *604and Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) (jointly “Samsung”) now move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, which the Court refers to as the “TAC.” There was no oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b).…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- BAYDA v. HOWMET CASTINGS & SERVICESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- BAYDA v. HOWMET CASTINGS & SERVICESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- CREST FURNITURE, INC. v. ASHLEY HOMESTORES, LTD.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- GENERAL MOTORS LLC v. ASHTONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.