Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Woodstock Mills

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1935No. 6 Div. 621PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an action of trover brought by the appellee, Woodstock Mills, a corporation, against the appellant, Southern Railway Company, claiming damages for the alleged conversion of personal property of the plaintiff.

The complaint consists of seven counts. In counts 1 and 2 the property alleged to have 'been converted is described as “Two (2) carloads of machinery, shipped from Pel-ham, Georgia, on the 7th day of April, 1933, by V. T. McKee to J. S. McKee at Anniston, Alabama.” In count 5 the property is described as “a quantity of cotton mill machinery, including st,eam engines…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Bolling v. Kirby & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Barrett v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. Commercial Union Fire Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. ParvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Herring v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. BlanchardAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Folmar v. Montgomery Fair Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API