Legal Opinion

Herring v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1938No. 6 Div. 358PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.,The. action was upon a through bill of lading issued for an interstate shipment of freight to recover for nondelivery of a .portion of the shipment. The action was by the shipper, .and owner against the delivering railway, carrier. The cause vyas here on former appeal. See Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. Herring, 234 Ala. 238, 174 So. 502.

Following that decision, the claim was .adjusted as to all items, except “two small band-painted pictures,” “four sterling silver .candlesticks,” and “one sterling silver tea . service.” The complaint was recast accordingly. Pleas in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Director General of Railroads v. Viscose Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. Woodstock MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Grindsted Products, Inc. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Hecker Products Corp. v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Semi Metals, Inc. v. Pinter BrothersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API