Folmar v. Montgomery Fair Company, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
MADDOX, Justice (dissenting).
Although I can admit that this is a close case, I believe the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment in this particular case.
This is a negligence action and I realize that, as a general proposition, issues of negligence are ordinarily not susceptible to summary adjudication. See Committee Comments, ARCP, Rule 56. Nevertheless, a motion for summary judgment may be granted, even in a negligence action, when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show two things: (1) that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Griffin Lumber Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.