Legal Opinion · Dissent

Folmar v. Montgomery Fair Company, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 13, 1975No. SC 737Published

1Dissent

MADDOX, Justice (dissenting).

Although I can admit that this is a close case, I believe the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment in this particular case.

This is a negligence action and I realize that, as a general proposition, issues of negligence are ordinarily not susceptible to summary adjudication. See Committee Comments, ARCP, Rule 56. Nevertheless, a motion for summary judgment may be granted, even in a negligence action, when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show two things: (1) that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Griffin Lumber Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API