Legal Opinion

Texas Moline Plow Co. v. Klapproth

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1919No. 37-2688PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Eighth Supreme Judicial District. Proceeding hy H. Klapproth against Mrs. Delia Hooper and the Texas Moline Plow Company, to foreclose a deed of trust. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, which was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals <164 S. W. 399), and the last-named defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, P. J.

A full statement of the pleadings and material facts will be found in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 164 S. W. 399.

H. Klapproth, who was plaintiff in the trial court sued Mrs. Delia Hooper, a widow, to recover upon certain promissory notes and foreclose a deed of trust on certain lands, the property of Julia Hooper.

It was alleged that the notes and deed of trust were executed hy M. T. Hooper, the duly authorized agent of Julia Hooper, and it was further alleged that if the execution of the notes and deed of trust were not properly authorized hy Julia Hooper that she, after their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reese v. MedlockTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Frost v. Erath Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Wiess v. GoodhueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. First National Bank v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Zimpelman v. KeatingTexas Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gray v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Franke v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Means v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. First Nat. Bank v. BladesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API