Legal Opinion

Frost v. Erath Cattle Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1891No. 6895PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Judge, Section B.

This suit was instituted in form of trespass to try title by appellee against appellant on December 29, 1885, in tiie District Court of Hood County, to recover the W. R. Martin 640 acres survey in that county. After the patent appellee’s title consisted of consecutive transfers to himself, the first of these trans fers being a letter of attorney from Richard B. Kimball, the patentee of the land, to Richard Kimball, together with a deed thereunder executed by the attorney in fact, Richard Kimball, to Rebecca De Cordova, embracing • a number of surveys in Hood and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reese v. MedlockTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  2. McKie v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Borel v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Skaggs v. Murchison & ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Deakin v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. First National Bank in Dallas v. KinabrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Avis v. First National Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. in the Estate of Edythe A. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2014
  4. Musquiz v. Marroquin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  5. Skirvin v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API