Knowles v. State Ex Rel. Lindeen
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 ‘It requires but little appreciation ... of what happened in this country during the 1920’s and 1930’s to realize how essential it is that the highest ethical standards prevail in every facet of the securities industry.” SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc., 375 U.S. 180, 186-87, 84 S. Ct. 275, 280 (1963) (ellipsis in Capital Gains, internal quotation marks omitted). The Securities Act of Montana, set out in Title 30, chapter 10, parts 1 through 3 of the Montana Code Annotated, serves to achieve this goal. First enacted in 1961, the Act is a substantial adoption of the major…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Johansen v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Langager v. Crazy Creek Products, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Williamson v. Montana Public Service Commission & Northwestern EnergyMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Redding v. Montana First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Mosley v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
- NorthWestern Corp. v. Montana Department of Public Service RegulationMontana Supreme Court · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.