Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoskins

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 11, 1993No. 67,486; CM 8903849PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge.

Appellant stands convicted of premeditated murder. The granted issue asks whether the evidence is legally sufficient to sustain the conviction. We must determine whether a reasonable factfinder could have found all the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt; and in reviewing for legal sufficiency, we must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); United States v. Turner, 25 MJ 324 (CMA 1987).1

*344FACTS

In its memorandum opinion, the Court of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. TeeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. AyalaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. AyalaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. EbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. ParkerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API