Legal Opinion
McLeod v. Adams
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 28, 1928No. 4 Div. 344PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The provisions in the Code, § 6110 (Grand United Order, etc., v. Workman [Ala. Sup.] 117 So. 6591), or those of section 6095, do not relieve the appellants of the required duty of assigning errors according to the prevailing rules of law in this jurisdiction. Williams v. State, 215 Ala. 586, 112 So. 193; Stokes v. Stokes, 212 Ala. 190, 101 So. 885.
"An assignment of errors in the transcript on appeal is not dispensed with by the rule in respect of abstracts." Cottingham v. Armour Packing Co., 109 Ala. 421, 19 So. 842. The provisions for assignment of errors, Supreme Court Rules 1-4, vol. 4,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hall v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Tuskaloosa Cotton-Seed Oil Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Hames v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Caheen v. CaheenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Tatum v. RestebSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Rabren v. MuddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Skinner v. JacksonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
- Stroud v. StroudSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.