Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Jackson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1938No. 2 Div. 624PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court rule 1 requires: "In assigning errors, it shall be sufficient to state concisely, in writing, in what error consists, which assignment must be written upon the transcript."

In this case the purported assignment of error is made on a separate sheet of paper, which is attached to a page of the transcript with ordinary paper fasteners subject to easy detachment and removal. This is the identical question decided in Hunter v. Louisville N. R. Co., 150 Ala. 594, 595,43 So. 802, 9 L.R.A., N.S., 848, in which it was held that the rule above referred to, and quoted, was not complied with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hunter v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Doe ex dem. Rowe v. GoetchiusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Pugh v. HardmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. McLeod v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. E. W. Gates Lumber Co. v. GivinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patton v. Colbert CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Fuller v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Skinner v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. State ex rel. Strange v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API