Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pruitt v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2010No. 2010-0005PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant, Michael Jarmal Pruitt, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellees, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas and Judge Michael P. Donnelly, to issue a revised sentencing entry that is final and appealable, albeit for reasons different from those expressed by the appellate court.

{¶ 2} We agree with Pruitt that if a trial court has not issued a final, appealable order and refuses to issue a revised sentencing entry, the defendant can seek to compel the court to act by filing an action for a writ of mandamus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Watkins v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Culgan v. Medina County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. McAllister v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Dehler v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Davis v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Davis v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Alicea v. KrichbaumOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Cunningham v. LindemanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API