Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dehler v. Kelly

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 2009No. 2009-1121PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of mandamus to compel a prison warden to provide properly fitting shoes to appellant, Lambert Dehler. Mandamus will not compel the performance of an act that has already been performed. State ex rel. Fontanella v. Kontos, 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008-Ohio-1431, 885 N.E.2d 220, ¶ 6.

Lambert Dehler, pro se. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Ashley Dawn Rutherford, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

{¶ 2} The court of appeals correctly restricted its holding to Dehler himself because Dehler did not bring his mandamus case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ogan v. TeaterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State ex rel. Fontanella v. KontosOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. HeathOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Womack v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Pruitt v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Snead v. FerencOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State Ex Rel. Murray v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API