Legal Opinion

Preyer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1919No. 1726PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina, at Charleston; Henry A. M. Smith, Judge. Henry J. Preyer was convicted of violation of the Reed Amendment, and brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPP, Circuit Judge.

Preyer was indicted for transporting liquor into the state of South Carolina in violation of the Act of Congress of March 3, 1917 (39 Stat. 1069, c. 162 [Comp. St. 1918, §§ 8739a, 10387a-10387c]), known as the Reed Amendment. .The jury found him guilty and sentence followed. At the time of his trial it was apparently assumed by the court below, as well as by counsel on both sides, that he could be convicted, if the evidence otherwise *158warranted, although the liquor found in his possession was being carried to Florida, and not to South Carolina. In consequence .no issue was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. GudgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duckworth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. McCanless v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  3. United States v. WinklerDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1924
  4. Preyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API