Legal Opinion
Duckworth v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 10, 1941No. 4205PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeieetN Smith, C. J.
Jim Duckworth was found guilty of transporting alcoholic liquors through Arkansas without having procured a permit from the commissioner of revenues. He was fined $500.*
The judgment recites that the cause was heard 2 “upon the stipulations of witnesses’ testimony and the argument of counsel.” Essentials of the agreed statement are in the margin. 3
An appeal involving construction of § 14177 of Pope’s Digest was before this court in 1939. Jones v. State, 198 Ark. 354, 129 S. W. 2d 249. In that case the defendant was charged with transporting fifty cases of “taxpaid liquor” 4 from Illinois to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- WILLSON AND OTHERS v. the Black Bird Creek Marsh CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Duckworth v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Geurin v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Morley v. Fifty Cases of WhiskeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Chambless v. CannonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
- People v. LearnardNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.