Legal Opinion
United States v. Winkler
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided May 19, 1924No. 4694PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
The defendants were tried and convicted upon a charge of having violated the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act (U. S. Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, §§ 10418b-10418f). The indictment alleged that they transported an automobile from Roswell, N. M., to El Paso, Tex., knowing same to have been stolen. The proof showed that the automobile was stolen in Amarillo, Tex., and transported by defendants by continuous journey frbm Amarillo, Tex., through the state of New Mexico, via Roswell, to El Paso, Tex. The defendants now present a motion for new trial, and urge as a ground…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hanley v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SpeightSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. GudgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Delaware, L. & W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
- United States v. MoynihanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. YaquintaDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1962
- Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Mortensen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Newport & Providence Railway Co. v. Paramount Coaches, Inc.Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1931