Legal Opinion

Brown Shoe Co. v. Crosby

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1923No. 13894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Head-notes 1 and 2 do not require elaboration. Nor do the others. It only remains to apply to • the facts of this case the well known principles therein announced.

For either of two separate reasons it was error to grant the new trial. First, conceding for the present that no error was committed in the ruling upon the pleadings, the- evidence failed altogether to show that the goods were totally worthless. The plea as it stood was not sustained by the proof. Again, no data was furnished by which to determine the reduction to be made for the alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consolidated Phosphate Co. v. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Stimpson Specialty Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Spence Drug Co. v. American Soda Fountain Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Thompson Oil Mill Co. v. Murray Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Horne & Ponder v. O. B. & E. J. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Coffee v. Worsham & WeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Villa Rica Manufacturing Co. v. General American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Harmon v. Block & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. John Deere Co. v. Lindsey Land Clearing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API