Coffee v. Worsham & Weaver

(After stating the foregoing facts.) We think that the evidence demanded the verdict, and that the result would not have been different if all the rulings and charges had been as the plaintiff in error would have had them.

Dealing first with the covenant of the seller to establish at Valdosta an agency carrying parts, and to keep a service man in that territory, so that the tractor might be kept in running order conveniently and without delay, there was sufficient proof that this promise was both made and breached, but not a scintilla of evidence as to what was the extent of the resulting…