Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Block & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1924No. 15200PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. In an action to recover the purchase price of goods sold and delivered i-t is necessary, in order to sustain a plea of total failure of consideration, that it appear that the goods were totally worthless for any purpose. Brown Shoe Co. v. Crosby, 30 Ga. App. 534 (4) (118 S. E. 446). To sustain a plea of partial failure of consideration it is necessary that the evidence furnish sufficient data to enable the jury to infer to what amount the consideration has partially failed. Prescott v. Seacoast Fertilizer Co., 30 Ga. App. 193 (117 S. E. 254); Grier v. Enterprise Co., 126 Ga. 17 (54 S. E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Prescott v. Seacoast Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. SOUTHERN SALES COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. A. Perley Fitch Co. v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  3. John Deere Co. v. Lindsey Land Clearing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Colt Co. v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Colt Co. v. MalloryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API