Legal Opinion

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Fuji Photo Film Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 19, 2009No. Civ. Act. 03-241-JJFPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are two motions filed by Plaintiff, St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. (“St. Clair”): (1) a Motion For New Trial On Damages Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 59, Or In The Alternative, Motion For Prejudgment And Post-Judgment Interest (D.I. 1040), and (2) a Motion For A New Trial On Infringement Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 If There Is A Modification Of The Court’s Claim Construction (D.I. 1041). For the reasons discussed, the Motion For New Trial On Damages Pursuant To Fed. R.Civ.P. 59, Or In The Alternative, Motion For…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
Till v. SCS Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant. Premix, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
Lummus Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. D.M. & E. Corporation, and MacHine Development Corporation, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. v. Abbott Diabetes CareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010