Legal Opinion
Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant. Premix, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 22, 1991No. 90-1121, 90-1122PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
Uniroyal, Inc. and Premix, Inc. (collectively Uniroyal) appeal the judgments by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Civ. Nos. N-75-51 (EBB) and B-80-281 (EBB) (Aug. 23, 1989), holding Uniroyal and Premix liable for damages for infringement of claims 1 and 2 of United States Patent No. 3,241,876 (the ’876 patent) licensed to Rudkin-Wiley Corporation (Rudkin-Wiley). Rudkin-Wiley also appeals the judgments on the grounds that the court erred in reducing its damage award by 20%, in failing to find the infringement of Uniroyal and Premix was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Eric W. Forman, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Cordis Corp. v. Medtronic Ave, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- In Re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Goodwall Construction Co. v. Beers Construction Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
- McHale v. Boulder Capital LLC (In Re 1031 Tax Group, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.