Legal Opinion

Young v. Rose (In Re Rose)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 5, 1988No. 19-41549PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: DISCHARGEABILITY UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(9)

ARTHUR J. SPECTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

On June 26, 1987, the above debtor filed for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. On the debtor’s Schedule A-3 was listed a contingent, unliquidated debt owing to the plaintiffs in this adversary proceeding. On September 1, 1987, the plaintiffs filed a complaint to determine the dischargeability of their claim under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(9). On September 26, 1987, the debtor received his Chapter 7 discharge, subject, of course, to the limitation which the outcome of this adversary…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Haggar Co. v. Helvering, Com'r of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Castiglia v. Morgan (In Re Morgan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re David Rock Hudson, Debtor. Gregory Stackhouse and Esther Stackhouse v. David Rock HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  3. Matter of BeltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  4. Waag v. Permann (In Re Waag)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Lugo v. PaulsenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API