Legal Opinion

Hubert v. City of Thomasville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1916No. 7664PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Certiorari; from Thomas superior court — Judge Thomas. June 12, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

2Per curiam

The ruling in this case is not contrary to anything that was said by this court in the cases of Porter v. Thomasville, 16 Ga. App. 313 (85 S. E. 283); Moore v. Thomasville, 17 Ga. App. 285 (86 S. E. 641), or Sampson v. Thomasville, 17 Ga. App. 541 (87 S. E. 835), cited in the motion for rehearing. Neither is it in conflict with the ruling in Linder v. Benfroe, 1 Ga. App. 58 (57 S. E. 975), that “in application for certiorari, all the allegations of fact therein contained, including statements of what was testified, are to be taken and considered as true'by the court,…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Linder v. RenfroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Moore v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Stallworth v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Sampson v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. Mayor of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Mantovani v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Williams v. City of DublinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Ellett v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Sauceman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API