Hubert v. City of Thomasville
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Thomas superior court — Judge Thomas. June 12, 1916.
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
2Per curiam
The ruling in this case is not contrary to anything that was said by this court in the cases of Porter v. Thomasville, 16 Ga. App. 313 (85 S. E. 283); Moore v. Thomasville, 17 Ga. App. 285 (86 S. E. 641), or Sampson v. Thomasville, 17 Ga. App. 541 (87 S. E. 835), cited in the motion for rehearing. Neither is it in conflict with the ruling in Linder v. Benfroe, 1 Ga. App. 58 (57 S. E. 975), that “in application for certiorari, all the allegations of fact therein contained, including statements of what was testified, are to be taken and considered as true'by the court,…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Linder v. RenfroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Moore v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Stallworth v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Sampson v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
4Cited by25 opinions
- Gillespie v. Mayor of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Mantovani v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Williams v. City of DublinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Ellett v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Sauceman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.