Legal Opinion

Sampson v. City of Thomasville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1916No. 7035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari; from Thomas superior court — Judge Thomas. October 16, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. While the petition for certiorari alleged that the city had no ordinance prohibiting the offense which the accused was charged with, it at the same time set forth what it called an “alleged ordinance” of the city, which on its face appeared to be a valid ordinance and which did prohibit such offense. The presumption is that a municipal ordinance is valid, and the burden of establishing its invalidity is on the person asserting it. Moore v. Thomasville, 17 Ga. App. 285 (86 S. E. 641), and cases therein cited. In this case, the petitioner for certiorari did not overcome this presumption.

2.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hubert v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Merwel Developers, Inc. v. City of Marietta, Board of Adjustments.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API