Legal Opinion

Sauceman v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1952No. 17832PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. The overruling of a general demurrer by an inferior judicatoiy exercising criminal jurisdiction is a final judgment, and will authorize an application by the demurrant for a writ of certiorari to the superior court. Barnes v. Fleetwood, 5 Ga. App. 296 (63 S. E. 60); Nalley & Co. v. Moore, 51 Ga. App. 718 (181 S. E. 429).

2. It has been held in civil cases that it is not necessary to pay the costs and give security before the sanction of a writ of certiorari. Jones v. Johnson & Ledbetter &c. Co., 185 Ga. 323, 325 (4) (194 S. E. 902). A different rule is applicable in all cases…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. Mayor of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Hubert v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Johns v. City of TiftonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Stallworth v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Veazey v. Mayor of CrawfordvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foster v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. West v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Christine Williams v. City of DouglasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API