Legal Opinion

Maxey v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 19, 1999No. CA 98-1330PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Bird, Judge.

Louise Maxey appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission holding that she was not permanently and totally disabled, but that she was entitled to benefits for a 35% wage-loss disability. The Second Injury Fund argues on cross-appeal that the Commission erred in awarding appellant wage-loss benefits on a scheduled injury. Appellee Tyson Foods takes the position that the Commission did not err in finding that appellant failed to prove permanent and total disability, but it does not address the Second Injury Fund’s argument.

At the time of the hearing in 1997,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Lawhon Farm Services v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Bearden Lumber Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Vanderpool v. Fidelity & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Hercules Inc. v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative v. BilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Maxey v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Crelia v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Farmers Cooperative v. BilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API