Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Jones

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 6, 1978No. 33681PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

Irene Crosby seeks specific performance of a contract involving the sale of timber rights. The trial court granted Eula Jones’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the deed under which Irene Crosby claims title through her deceased husband, Ernest, was testamentary in character, was never probated, and therefore was ineffective to pass any title to her husband. We reverse.

1. Laura Crosby, the plaintiffs mother-in-law, deeded forty acres to her son, Ernest Alton Crosby, in 1937, with the following language included in it: "Title use and occupancy of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Gardner v. ThamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  4. Sudderth v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duffield v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Ware v. DurhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Stynchcombe v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  4. Jones v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API