Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Thames

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1967No. 24085PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The single question for our decision is whether an instrument in the form of- a deed is a deed as the trial court ruled or whether it is testamentary in character and is consequently not a deed. As pointed out in Smith v. Thomas, 199 Ga. 396 (34 SE2d 278), this court in Patellis v. Tanner, 197 Ga. 471 (29 SE2d 419), listed many decisions of-this court where the instrument dealt with was construed to be testamentary in character and hence not a deed, and then listed many decisions where the instrument dealt with was a deed. Then we said at page 399 of the Smith case,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patellis v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Smith v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. Fourth Nat. Bank of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Crosby v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Black v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Harris v. NeelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Matthews v. CrowderSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API