Legal Opinion

Ware v. Durham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1980No. 36210PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

Certiorari was granted to review the entire decision of the Court of Appeals in Durham v. Ware, 153 Ga. App. 701 (266 SE2d 342) (1980), which allowed a purchaser of realty to recover "actual damages” from his closing attorneys rather than limiting the sum recoverable from the attorneys to the amount that could have been recovered by the purchaser from the seller pursuant to Code Ann. § 29-202 had the purchaser sought damages from the seller for failure of title to a part of the tract instead of seeking rescission.

1. The closing attorneys insist that an attorney sued for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ham v. HamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. McDow v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Hill v. CloudCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Crosby v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Kirby v. ChesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Lewis v. UseltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Rubin Resources v. Garold "Gary" W. Morris, IIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Alston v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API