Kokin v. Key Food Supermarket, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
On its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant met its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by offering evidence that it neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition (see Gomez v David Minkin Residence Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc., 85 AD3d 1112 [2011]; Freiser v Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., LLC, 84 AD3d 1307, 1308 [2011]; Boyar v New York City Tr. Auth., 10 AD3d 625, 626 [2004]). Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Solazzo v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Capasso v. CapassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Pinto v. Metropolitan OperaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Freiser v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nai Ren Jiang v. Shane YehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Halpern v. Costco Warehouse/ Costco WholesaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Keizer v. SCO Family of ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Willis v. Galileo Cortlandt, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sutin v. PawlusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.