Legal Opinion
Fox v. Fox
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 17, 1975PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
This appeal arises from an action brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendants, George C. Fox and Samuel R. Palmisano, whose respective vehicles collided at the intersection of West Putnam Avenue and the Old Post Road No. 4 in the town of Greenwich. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs against the defendant Palmisano only. Prom that judgment and the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict, Palmisano, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, has appealed to this court. The only issues briefed by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Preferred Accident Insurance v. Musante, Berman & Steinberg Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Pappas v. PappasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Intelisano v. GreenwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Rose v. HeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Gionfriddo v. Gartenhaus CafeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Gomeau v. ForrestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. GrassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- State v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.