Legal Opinion

The United States, in Error v. Horace Southmayd and Stephen C. Southmayd

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1850PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

50 U.S. 637

9 How. 637

13 L.Ed. 290

THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,

v.

HORACE SOUTHMAYD AND STEPHEN C. SOUTHMAYD.

January Term, 1850

1

THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

2

It involved the same question as the preceding case of Marriott v. Brune, viz. whether, in calculating the duties upon an importation of sugar, allowance should be made for leakage and drainage, with the additional fact in evidence, that the purchaser abroad takes into consideration the probable loss in fixing the price to be paid.

3

Ther…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Woodbury.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SouthmaydSupreme Court of the United States · 1850

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Lee F. Dilworth v. T. N. Riner, Owner of Tom's RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. United States v. Dale Einar SynnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API