Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lantzy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1998PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petitioner may, after having withdrawn his direct appeal and post-sentence motions contesting the validity of his guilty plea and sentence, restore these challenges by asserting that sentencing counsel was ineffective for advising him to withdraw his appeal and motions in return for a modified sentence. Jesse D. Lantzy maintains that by following his counsel’s advice, he was deprived of the right to take a direct appeal when a panel of this Court vacated his modified sentence and reinstated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. YagerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. AppelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. GranberrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt v. DescaresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. EllerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Harber Philadelphia Center City Office Ltd. v. LPCI Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API