Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mayes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1917No. 8951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Original application of Henry Mayes for writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, O. J.

In the month of February, 1917, the petitioner was tried and convicted in the police court oY the city of Pawhuska for the violation of an ordinance of said city providing for the levy and payment of a license tax of $25 per annum for each automobile operated for hire in said city. The power of the city to enact the ordinance under which petitioner was convicted and imprisoned is assailed upon numerous grounds, but one of which need receive our consideration. ' The ordinance under which the city acted and its chief of police here justifies his custody of the petitioner provides:

“Th…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Muskogee v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Ex Parte HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. The Best Foods, Inc. v. Christensen, State Treas.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Ex Parte DickisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Sylvania Busses, Inc. v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API