Bannister v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
— Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.
We deem it not necessary to discuss the sufficiency of the testimony. Appellant and her husband were found in possession of a house in which were some two hundred bottles of beer, several gallons of whisky, a number of cases of bottles, and bottles and jars in sacks, etc., around over the place. The husband was a cripple confined to his bed and the appellant admitted in her testimony that she had to run the place herself.
The validity of a search made by the officers…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goldberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- Eggleston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Driskill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Blain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Burge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- State v. ShephardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Cass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Caldarera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.