Driskill v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Arizona; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge. David B. Driskill was convicted of having unlawful possession of' intoxicating liquor, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
Defendant was convicted of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor (National Prohibition Act, 41 Stat. 314). He assigns as error (1) the reception of evidence alleged to have come into the possession of the government through a wrongful search and seizure; and (2) the refusal of the court to direct an acquittal because of the insufficiency of the evidence. The latter assignment is thought to be devoid of merit, and we dismiss it without discussion.
Search and seizure. On April 23, 1921, a deputy marshal, in company with two special agents and three'state…
2Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Sferas (Two Cases). United States v. SkallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- United States v. William Leroy EldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Lee Edgar Sartain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Craft v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Joseph Friedman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.