Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Continental Casualty Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 29, 2017No. Case No. 5:10-cv-05238-EJDPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 148, 155

EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

The Internal Revenue Code permits owners of investment property to defer capital gains taxes that would otherwise be due upon the sale of the property through a transaction known as a “1031 exchange.” “In a typical 1031 Exchange, an exchanger [the owner of the investment property] sells'a parcel of real estate and has 45 days to identify a ‘replacement’ property, and 180 days to close on the purchase of the ‘replacement’ property.” Compl, at ¶24. For taxes to be…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crum & Forster Indemnity Company v. Robb Report Media LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  2. Duron v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  3. Regis Metro Associates, Inc. v. NBR Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  4. Wag Hotels, Inc. v. Wag Labs, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API