Legal Opinion
Dixon v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 3, 1992No. Civ. A. H-88-2313PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Instrument No. 36) submitted by the Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”). Having considered the motion, the lack of a response, plaintiffs representation to the Court at docket call that the motion is unopposed, and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff brings this action in order to recover contractual damages and damages for breach of the common law duty of good faith and fair dealing arising…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Douglas v. State Farm LloydsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Robinson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- McCaskey v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Young v. Players Lake Charles, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Riggs v. City of PearlandDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.