Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 4, 1932No. 4777PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a .judgment entered upon a verdict in a suit in assumpsit brought by the beneficiary on a policy of accident insurance. The policy contained the following pertinent provisions:

“The Company does hereby insure Hiram Harris against bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent and accidental means, that independently of all other causes results in death or the disabilities set forth.
“Special Payments.
“Not otherwise covered under the insuring clause of the poliey.
“1. If sunstroke, freezing or hydrophobia, caused by external, violent and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RossiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. GENERAL ACC. FIRE & LIFE ASSUR. CORPORATION v. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reardon v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Raley v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Howes v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Order of United Commercial Travelers v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  5. Sykes v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API