Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 29, 1952PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

This is an action brought by the beneficiary named in three life insurance policies to recover the double indemnity for which the policies provided in case of accidental death. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff which the court refused to set aside. On this appeal the defendant has assigned as error that ruling, various instructions contained in the charge and two rulings on evidence.

Upon the trial of the case it was undisputed that the plaintiff refused the demand for an autopsy made by the defendant. The principal contention of the defendant with reference to the verdict is that,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  3. MacKay v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Wehle v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Rinaldi v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. DelVecchio v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. City of West Haven v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Eastern Sportswear Co. v. S. Augstein & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Kasper v. Provident Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API