Legal Opinion

State v. Hiatt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1936No. 26111. En BancPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLARD, C.J., STEINERT, and HOLCOMB, JJ., dissent. The appellants Marinoff and Hiatt were charged, together with Oscar Wold, J.L. Hanford and Theo Fergeson, with the crime of murder in the first degree. Marinoff was charged as an accessory before the fact and the others as direct participants.

A trial was had to a jury. At the close of the state's case, the prosecutor acquiesced in a directed verdict of not guilty as to the defendant Wold. The case as to the other defendants was submitted to the jury, resulting in a verdict finding each of the four guilty of manslaughter. The defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CushingWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. KrugerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. AshWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State v. HilsingerWashington Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. StuddWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re Brandon v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API