Legal Opinion

State v. Kruger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1910No. 9065PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered April 16, 1910, upon a conviction of assault in the third degree, after a trial upon an information charging assault in the second degree.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Appellant was charged with the crime of assault in the second degree. The charging part of the indictment is as follows:

“He the said Arthur Kruger, on the 16th day of January, A. D. 1910, in the county of King, state of Washington, aforesaid, did wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously assault one Alma Langstrom, with intent then and there to commit the crime of rape.”

The testimony of the prosecuting witness, if believed, shoivs a consummated rape. Appellant’s evidence tends to prove an alibi. The complainant also testified that, on two or three occasions, appellant had robbed her of money.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DolanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. McPhailWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. ClemWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Smith v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. PepoonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. WhitfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. AshWashington Supreme Court · 1912

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API