Legal Opinion
W. H. Bintz Co. v. Mueggler
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1944No. 7154PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.
This is an action for recovery of possession of a bread-wrapping machine sold by appellant to respondent under a written contract of purchase and sale, and for damages.
About June 21, 1938, appellant, a Utah corporation, entered into a conditional sale contract with respondent, doing business in Caldwell under the firm name of Mueggler City Bakery, for shipment to respondent of the following described property:
“1-only No. 8 Gellman Speed Grant Wrapper with elevator plates for Katzinger Pan 4044-A
Total Time Price $1,138.60
Less Trade in Allowance $115.00
Less down payment 150.00 265.00
Unpaid Time…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richard Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Roach v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Hunter v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Peuser v. . MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Wayne Tank & Pump Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Nelson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- C. I. T. Corporation v. ElliottIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- U. S. MacHinery Co. v. International Metals Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Pioneer Engineering Works, Inc. v. McConnellMontana Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.