Legal Opinion

State v. Hatfield

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 2001No. C9-00-1183PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge

On direct appeal, appellant Michael Allen Hatfield challenges his convictions for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and child endangerment, arguing that there was insufficient evidence in the record to support the convictions. Because there was no evidence establishing an actual agreement between Hatfield and another person to manufacture methamphetamine, we reverse his conviction for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. Because there was evidence establishing that Hatfield had placed his children in danger, we affirm his conviction for child…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. AuchampachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. WalenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Sisson v. TriplettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State v. TiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API