London v. Insurance Placement Facility
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the Insurance Placement Facility (Facility) should be permitted to depreciate the cost of repairs to a building when a policyholder under the Pennsylvania Fair Plan Act (Fair Plan)1 sustains a loss by fire. Under the specific terms of these Fair Plan policies, we hold that the Facility may depreciate the cost of repairs. Therefore, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand with instructions.
The pertinent facts and procedural history of this case can be summarized as follows: The Facility provided basic property insurance to each…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. StrausserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. ZeranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Jeffrey v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Tyler v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Burton v. Republic InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Papurello v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Kane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.