Dowling v. Yamashiro
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Karla Moskowitz, J.
In this small claims action, claimant seeks reimbursement for attorney’s fees he incurred defending himself in a holdover proceeding (L&T No. 105469). His action is predicated on section 234 of the Real Property Law.
Defendant alleges that: claimant cannot bring a separate action for attorney’s fees because claimant did not request them in his answer and the landlord would be barred (930 Fifth Corp. v King, 42 NY2d 886); that until the matter is finally adjudicated, it is inappropriate to allow attorney’s fees; and that claimant has failed to show that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- 930 Fifth Corp. v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Elkins v. Cinera Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- N. V. Madison, Inc. v. SaurweinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
- McMahon v. SchwartzCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Feierstein v. MoserNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Scotia Associates v. BondCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Galicia v. Rota Holding Corp. 2Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008