Legal Opinion

Dowling v. Yamashiro

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided October 18, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Karla Moskowitz, J.

In this small claims action, claimant seeks reimbursement for attorney’s fees he incurred defending himself in a holdover proceeding (L&T No. 105469). His action is predicated on section 234 of the Real Property Law.

Defendant alleges that: claimant cannot bring a separate action for attorney’s fees because claimant did not request them in his answer and the landlord would be barred (930 Fifth Corp. v King, 42 NY2d 886); that until the matter is finally adjudicated, it is inappropriate to allow attorney’s fees; and that claimant has failed to show that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 930 Fifth Corp. v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Elkins v. Cinera Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. N. V. Madison, Inc. v. SaurweinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
  4. McMahon v. SchwartzCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feierstein v. MoserNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Scotia Associates v. BondCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
  3. Galicia v. Rota Holding Corp. 2Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API