Legal Opinion

Galicia v. Rota Holding Corp. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Not only does the lease in question expressly provide for reciprocal attorney fees, but section 234 provides that any residential lease entitling a landlord to seek attorney fees implies a reciprocal covenant requiring the landlord to compensate a successful tenant for such fees and expenses (see Cier Indus. Co. v Hessen, 136 AD2d 145, 150 [1988]). The statute thus applies to the substantial attorney fees incurred in this case because defendant landlord would have been entitled to such fees had it been successful in a similar action against plaintiff tenant for breach of the lease. Moreover,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cier Industries Co. v. HessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Chechak v. HakimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Dowling v. YamashiroCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  4. Calce v. FuttermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API