Legal Opinion

Coshocton Natl. Bank v. Hagans

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, PJ.

In November, 1926, upon demand of the tsank, $100 was paid upon the Bank’s mortgage, and in May, 1927, in compliance with the demands of the officers of the Bank, $400 more was paid upon the principal and a new note and mortgage executed by the mortgagors for $2500. it is perfectly manifest from all the evidence that this was a renewal of the unpaid balance of the original loan and was so understood by all parties concerned. A rigorous effort was made by Willard Hagans invalidate this last mortgage. The mortgage on its face was apparently duly executed and recorded. It therefore…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re: Bernard L. Zaptocky and Gloria J. Zaptocky, Debtors. David O. Simon, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Simon v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In Re Zaptocky)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Canton Morris Plan Bank v. MostOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Bash v. Lepelley (In Re Lepelley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  5. Baumgart v. Ford Consumer Finance (In Re Salamone)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API