Simon v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In Re Zaptocky)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Appellant Chase Manhattan Bank appeals the bankruptcy court’s determination that its mortgage on the home of the joint Chapter 7 Debtors, Bernard L. and Gloria J. Zaptocky, is avoidable by the Chapter 7 Trustee pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 544(a) because the execution of the mortgage was not properly witnessed in accordance with Ohio law. We AFFIRM.
I. ISSUES ON APPEAL
This appeal presents two issues: (1) whether the bankruptcy court’s finding of fact that one of the attesting witnesses was not present during the Debtors’ execution of the mortgage is clearly erroneous; and (2) whether the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Darrell D. Thurman v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Reynoldsville Casket Co. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Treinish v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. (In Re Periandri)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- In Re: Bernard L. Zaptocky and Gloria J. Zaptocky, Debtors. David O. Simon, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of Valley-Vulcan Mold Co. v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. (In Re Valley-Vulcan Mold Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Bavely v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Cowan)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Best v. Galloway (In Re Best)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.